So, in a nutshell, you'll sit on your high horse and pot these outfits non-stop because you can't get in / until you can get in - and then once you manage to find yourself an agent/player relationship that gives you access to said site/s and therefore untapped $$$ possibilities, you'll slide down from your holier than thou position and suddenly they are no longer an issue of concern because you're in and making a motza.
And here you are trying to position yourself to all and sundry to be poles apart from your mate Walsh in ethics, business dealings, modus operandi etc. You two may as well have suckled from the same teat....
How on earth would you know that I can't get in?
Take Tabcorp and Betfair.
I'm a significant customer with both. But at times their harshest critic. Maybe to my personal detriment.
But in that process I don't resort to anything that's not on the public record.
Furthermore my principal beefs, often stated, are why are Tabcorp, Napthine whomever forcing some towards that direction. And why do the regulators and media fail to confront this?
And were I to go that way, I'd have no problem if the authorities ever closed them down. For good. For everyone.
So no ethical concerns for me in any direction.
There are some unsubtle differences between Walsh and me.
For starters I have never been mentioned in connection with fraud in Hansard or anywhere else.
And I manage to satisfy many of my baser needs over the Internet. Rather than establishing a porn museum.
Or patronising Stillettos. But I wouldn't bet Walsh being allowed in, if he actually managed to find it.
And I don't need to employ 300 Quants to change a light bulb.