TheAnalyser
Listed user 936
Offline
Posts : 339
|
|
|
Original Post 2010-Oct-21, 11:50 AM
|
I'm very interested in seeing how people analyse their performance whether it be a system or your own tips.
Do you analyse lay betting differently to other betting methods ?
As most of my concentration is on lay betting at the moment I am interested to see how others are analysing their performance. I don't think PROFIT is a good enough clue to a systems performance when you are trying to decide on the long term prospects of the selection system/tips. Especially when laying as if you are wrong the cost can add up very quickly.
Here is how I am currently doing it and I would be very interested on thoughts and alternative methods.
1. Use a simple calc to work out expectation in dollars. A positive figure from this calc will mean you are laying with value (ie under the odds).
Expecation = 1/(1 - StrikeRate) - 1 - AverageOdds
I would expect a figure above $2.00 here to be a good system but anything positive means you are laying under the odds. Anything negative is a long term loser.
2. Use the lay keely edge calculation. It is reproduced here but a better explanation can be found on google. It provides an edge.
Expectation = (StrikeRate * Profit) - ((1 - StrikeRate) * Liability)
I would expect a figure above 10% here to be a good system but anything positive means you are laying under the odds. Anything negative is a long term loser.
3. Coverage of your maximum Winner. If you lay up to $5 how many times can you cover a horse winning at those odds. I would feel a system needs at least 10 - 20 coverages before you can be confident you have analysed enough selections.
4. Level stakes profit/loss. This is based on staking to lose a fixed amount per selection. This is the correct way to do level stakes for laying (I learnt this here and agree with it). You need to analyse the system using a risk of $100. Anything above $1000 profit would indicate a good system.
Well I have thrown this out there and I think all of the above is a fairly in depth way of analysing lay systems but I would be very interested in new ways to do it. I am always looking to learn.
Here are the questions I would like others to answer:
1. Do you know any other ways ? 2. Do you think the above are good /terrible ways to analyse lay betting systems ? 3. Are my signposts for good systes (10% edge, etc) set at the right levels? Should they be higher/lower ?
Please comment/critique and argue for or against the above methods.
|