Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
2012-May-26, 03:58 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Racehorse TALK

Pages: [1] 2 3 4   Go Down
 
Author Topic: Wet Tracks  (Read 2724 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Authorized
Steward
Group 1
user 18
Offline Offline
Posts: 19683
Original Post 2011-Apr-10, 01:53 PM

Wet Track selections here.

Based on what ever it is you like about a horse on slow/heavy tracks.
Logged
 
dubbledee
Editor
Group 1
user 285
Offline Offline
Posts: 23874
2011-Apr-10, 02:35 PM

Don't bet on them and you'll retire much earlier.
Logged
Authorized
Steward
Group 1
user 18
Offline Offline
Posts: 19683
2011-Apr-10, 05:41 PM

  lol  The horse that inspired this thread, ran in Victoria, a first starter called Musician is bred to go in the wet.

She failed, she made ground in the straight but that was not what I was hopping.

The race was too soon for me to post the tip here.

I thought you, DD had a thread discussing wet tracks ?

Perhaps it was in another sperate thread.
Logged
Jim Pike
Group 2
user 561
Offline Offline
Alias: Henry
Posts: 4356
2011-Apr-10, 05:59 PM

Matt do you know why some breeds prefer wet tracks?
Logged
Authorized
Steward
Group 1
user 18
Offline Offline
Posts: 19683
2011-Apr-16, 11:04 AM

Matt do you know why some breeds prefer wet tracks?


I don't know, but I have a theory that MORE stamina is required on Heavy tracks.

The fact that some stallions have a greater influence on wet tracks indicates to me that conformation probably plays a part as well.

I would think if people had doubts about a particular horse staying a certain distance, than a Heavy track will not help there cause even if they are mud larks.

Logged
Jim Pike
Group 2
user 561
Offline Offline
Alias: Henry
Posts: 4356
2011-Apr-16, 02:33 PM

it is all conformation, of course if a horse isn't fit a wet track will find him out sooner but if it isn't a wet tracker it will get tired sooner because they tend to tense up and use more energy going nowhere
Logged
usernametaken
Listed
user 937
Offline Offline
Alias: jose
Posts: 480
2011-Apr-16, 07:56 PM

Overall conformation or shoulder area Jim ?
Just curious is all.
As I have a bit of a theory myself. (don't we all???)
Logged
Jim Pike
Group 2
user 561
Offline Offline
Alias: Henry
Posts: 4356
2011-Apr-18, 03:31 PM

Mainly the shoulder area, the angle of the shoulder is what dictates the stride, the stride dictates whether they can handle wet tracks, of course there can be a mental thing too, the main rule in racing is that there are no set rules that work in all situations, Champions can some times do the impossible and throw all rules out the door, with MJ was it the heavy track or did she go to the well once too often in her last 2 preps? or was it a combination of both?
Horses also have to be fit enough for a hard slog in the wet as well
Logged
dubbledee
Editor
Group 1
user 285
Offline Offline
Posts: 23874
2011-Apr-18, 05:04 PM

Horses with white feet can go poorly in the wet, too.

But it's a rule that only works sometimes.

The Sky boys are adamant that grey horses go well in wet, too.  Again, I think it's a matter of MAY go well in the wet.
Logged
wily ole dog
Group 1
user 218
Offline Offline
Posts: 10150
2011-Apr-18, 09:59 PM

I think the size of the hoof may have something to do with getting a better grip
Logged
Jim Pike
Group 2
user 561
Offline Offline
Alias: Henry
Posts: 4356
2011-Apr-19, 03:52 AM

You boys are either guessing or being facetious, what I said is fact, the size of their Hooves or their colour has absolutely no bearing on their wet track ability
Logged
wily ole dog
Group 1
user 218
Offline Offline
Posts: 10150
2011-Apr-19, 08:24 AM

Ok Jim,. I'll bow to your unquestionable knowledge
Logged
Jim Pike
Group 2
user 561
Offline Offline
Alias: Henry
Posts: 4356
2011-Apr-19, 01:40 PM

mate I wasn't trying to be a smart arse, just I know that Conformation and the stride is what makes a wet tracker, most horses have average hoof size and most are not wet trackers, the angle of the shoulder is the main criteria for determining the wet track ability, some horses get better as they get more practice but are never "genuine" wet trackers, Champions will give their best sometimes and will win in spite of a wet track not because of it, horses like Sacred Choice that are genuine wet trackers have a certain angle to their shoulder, of course she is very good and is still capable of winning races on better ground against inferior opposition
Logged
dubbledee
Editor
Group 1
user 285
Offline Offline
Posts: 23874
2011-Apr-19, 09:10 PM

I know of no trainer in the world who would be so silly as to try to predict whether or not a horse will handle soft without first trying it out.

I don't expect to get the answer from an internet forum.

But, the Sky Channel commentors seem to know.  Grey horses; just get on.
Logged
Jim Pike
Group 2
user 561
Offline Offline
Alias: Henry
Posts: 4356
2011-Apr-19, 09:52 PM

Most trainers don't bother looking at other trainers horses or studying what type of horse handles wet tracks, and I could care less what anyone thinks there IS a type that handles wet tracks and they vary immensely according to how heavy the track is and They ARE identifiable before ever having started on a wet track
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 4   Go Up
 
 
Jump to:  

 - Links - Luxbet Horse Racing Betting - Racenet - Horse Racing - Noms and Acc - QTAB - TAB Horse Racing Betting - Racing and Sports - Horse Racing Only
Powered by SMF 1.1.15 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines
TinyPortal v0.9.8 © Bloc | Adagio design by Bloc