Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
2012-May-26, 08:02 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Racehorse TALK

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6   Go Down
 
Author Topic: Disclosed form: is winning getting just too hard?  (Read 3548 times)
0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
Peter Mair
Group 2
user 326
Offline Offline
Posts: 1498
Original Post 2011-Jul-17, 10:23 PM



Disclosed form: is 'winning' getting just too hard?

While there are many pieces of evidence -- especially unexpectedly large Trifecta and F4 dividends -- pointing up the apparent difficulty most punters have 'reading' the form guide, it is also the case that professional media-tipsters are less often correct in their assessments these days.

Some years ago it was my practice to point up the regularity with which Shane Montgomery delivered the goods in his 'Monty's Top 5' selections in the Sydney Morning Herald, especially on Saturdays. I still consider this latter day 'Hats' to be the best of the free-to-see media tipsters but it is not as often these days that he excels.

He had a relatively good day yesterday -- in Sydney he had the first 3 legs of the $400+ quadrella 'on top' and the winner of the last leg was his 3rd selection (with the 'on top' pick running a close second) -- in Melbourne, in 5 of the 8 races, he selected 3 of the first4 placegetters from in his top 5.

Monty's results are indicative -- media tipsters generally do not rate very well and I suspect that most, including Monty, would say that the task of tipping winners has got harder  -- all irrespective of the better technology which form analysts have available these days. I will also plead guilty to a charge of 'declining competence' compared to a decade or so ago.

In looking for explanations, I certainly do not suggest that the less reliable results for Saturday racing reflect increased misbehaviour by participants  -- but I am inclined to say that the mature horses contesting most races are racing less consistently true to form than was so a generation ago. Presumably any decline in quality would show up in comparative ratings across the years  -- something 'unknown' seems to be delivering too much in the way of random results and inflated dividends.

Whatever, the outcomes are consistent with a general decline in the quality of the racing product delivered to punters and it hardly bodes well for the future of the local industry.

Logged
 
Steve M
Steward
Group 1
user 59
Offline Offline
Posts: 5587
2011-Jul-17, 10:43 PM

Ummm I think the competition & integrity of racing is at an all time high.
Logged
Jim Pike
Group 2
user 561
Offline Offline
Alias: Henry
Posts: 4356
2011-Jul-17, 11:06 PM

Pete on this one I do not totally disagree with you, one of the reasons I believe it is getting harder to win these days and it is only my opinion is the need to have dead tracks, horses that continually race on Fast tracks will tend to be much more consistent, fast(dr)y is fast, anything else and you have degrees and uneven tracks, it can be very hard to pick bias when it is subtle, it may only be a length or 2 and some horses will still win inspite of the bias and that makes it look like ther is no bias, on Dead or worse tracks with long grass it is not hard, it is impossible to have it even all over, even more so when it is artificially created, the big stables don't care because they rely on the law of averages to even it out, they lose some but win a lot more, the ones it really affects is any small stable who like a bet, they have to win the day they put the money on, running 3rd or 4th when the money is on then winning the next one when they are hot fav doesn't help, it also is detrimental to the average Punter, if you back a horse today and it gets beaten by bias then wins next time you can't collect the bet,

When Bias is obvious it is a lot better, it might look bad but it is a lot better than when it is subtle, when obvious all the horses/Jockeys will go looking for the best ground, when it is only a slight advantage and some horses buck the trend it makes it very hard to tell, you get a couple of horses win by a length on the worse part of a track when they may have won by 4 on an even track the rest of the day everyone thinks that part of the track is OK
Very few races are won by big margins, might only be a 2 lengths margin between 1st and 5th but there is a bloody big difference on a betting ticket

In short Punters would be much better off if we had a majority of fast tracks or Good 2's mostly I blame the you guessed it, breeding industry, the horses that we are breeding today are obviously much weaker(boned) than the old colonial breeds of the past! they can't carry weight, they can't handle good tracks without pulling up sore,

I do think they are killing the goose that laid the golden egg and they wonder why Sports betting is growing at the expense of the thoroughbred industry

For this reason don't necessarily back what I actually think will win, I look at it from a price point of view, like any product you want to buy, be it a car/House etc you do not always get the one that you want, you have to shop with in your budget, same with gambling, it is all about price, not necessarily the longest price but the one that I consider to be the most overs, I have long ago realised that no matter what price they are or how much study I do most of my bets will get beat for this reason I know that I must get top prices for everything I back, when you shop for a car you have some idea of what you are looking for and some idea of how much you are willing to pay for it, punting is no different
Logged
calgary
Group 1
user 61
Offline Offline
Posts: 8528
2011-Jul-18, 11:56 AM

Totally agree re: Fast/Good tracks.

That is the one major advantage of betting in Perth.
Logged
el zoro
Group 1
user 367
Offline Offline
Posts: 5078
2011-Jul-18, 12:16 PM

I don't follow media tipsters at all. I'm sure most wouldn't.
I really can't see the benefit of having so many media tipsters anyway, what's the point? Maybe 2 in each state is sufficient. Surely that's enough to please whoever looks at them. 

People must remember the newspaper tipsters are having a stab 2 days out & even they probably change their mind, come the time of the race. So again comes back to what is the point of having them?

Maybe it's only to create interest in a race??


 
Logged
pegasyber
Group3
user 909
Offline Offline
Alias: comprate
Posts: 581
2011-Jul-18, 12:51 PM

This post to be moved to Bettings Tips and Ratings.

« Last Edit: 2011-Jul-18, 02:02 PM by pegasyber » Logged
Gintara
VIP Club
Group 1
user 16
Offline Offline
Posts: 5870
2011-Jul-18, 03:37 PM

Totally agree re: Fast/Good tracks.

That is the one major advantage of betting in Perth.


Shhh Cal or people will wake up to it 
Logged
ledgerr77
Group3
user 279
Offline Offline
Posts: 752
2011-Jul-18, 03:41 PM

chin i think Deano has a bit on the Monty's, the Hatts and the Matt's of the world....the games changed Pete...most pro's wouldn't even bet on Melb/Sydney winter races
Logged
Peter Mair
Group 2
user 326
Offline Offline
Posts: 1498
2011-Jul-18, 06:36 PM



Where do the pros bet in the southern winter, please?

.......and if quality product cannot be delivered to southern punters over winter, why are the races run?

[Alas I cannot see the return of 'good' tracks let alone 'fast' tracks  -- and many share the 'tears i cry' view that watered tracks are unreliable.]
Logged
manikato1
Group 2
user 195
Offline Offline
Posts: 2163
2011-Jul-18, 08:10 PM

I wonder if changing to handicap ratings are playing a part?  Maybe making races more competitive, therefore making it harder to win races?

Just a thought.
Logged
Peter Mair
Group 2
user 326
Offline Offline
Posts: 1498
2011-Jul-18, 08:39 PM



A very sensible thought Manikato

I try not to lead the witnesses but 'watered tracks' and 'ratings-based' weights are two changes which have accompanied a gradual decline in the quality of the Saturday fields -- as would be revealed by the ratings of Saturday-horses declining, or not, over time.

I still hold the dedicated Mark Webby -- the displaced Sydney handicapper -- in the highest regard: along with Ray M he was a rock of integrity in the fledging beginnings of a RacingNSW now gone astray.

........ but I am happy to accept a ratings-based system provided, one, that the contracted ratings are proven objective and, two, that the actual rating returned for every run of every horse is published as well as the 'average' rating used for handicapping purposes.

Inconsistent ratings of actual runs are to be expected but they should generally be explicable for Saturday-class horses -- and horses unable to run 'explicably' consistently should be relegated to Tier2, unable to contest the best races.

While that sounds tough it would make connections wary of running horses in the best races that are 'unable to run to their rating' reliably.
Logged
ledgerr77
Group3
user 279
Offline Offline
Posts: 752
2011-Jul-18, 08:41 PM

chin they race 9 tab meetings a week in Vic.....1 saturday metro with fixed odds going up wednesday night ur looking at an over analyzed product...markets are worked out....then add in a dominant trainer Moody......add in very tactical race riding ....example no pace and the end result is a tricky, no value for being rewarded for hard work...most pro's prefer less discussed meets as u can still find value..ie....3 of  the other 8 meetings
Logged
Peter Mair
Group 2
user 326
Offline Offline
Posts: 1498
2011-Jul-18, 08:46 PM



My concern is that the hard work is for naught -- to say nothing of the risk of fixed-odds bookmakers leading the market astray
Logged
ledgerr77
Group3
user 279
Offline Offline
Posts: 752
2011-Jul-18, 08:51 PM


 exactly so review your winning days and find the pattern of ur wins...where when how much....the hard work is culling ur bad habit Thumb Up
Logged
fours
Group3
user 704
Offline Offline
Posts: 946
2011-Jul-18, 08:53 PM

Peter,

This varaince you are whining about is EASILY taken advantage of via exotics betting..... and with no inside information whatsoever.

Yes you have to bet a different way. Beats whining.

Fours
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6   Go Up
 
 
Jump to:  

 - Links - Luxbet Horse Racing Betting - Racenet - Horse Racing - Noms and Acc - QTAB - TAB Horse Racing Betting - Racing and Sports - Horse Racing Only
Powered by SMF 1.1.15 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines
TinyPortal v0.9.8 © Bloc | Adagio design by Bloc