Un-Australian - Punters turn on their glamour girl
Clinton Payne
Thursday, 20 October 2011
The large percentage of Racenet
readers have turned on Australia’s most popular racehorse Black Caviar after it
was announced Here De Angels has been moved out a barrier to cater for concerns
over the champion’s welfare in Saturday’s Group II Schweppes Stakes (1200m) at Moonee
Valley.
On Thursday afternoon
Racing Victoria stewards made the unprecedented move of approaching Here De
Angels's connections with the view to moving him away from the adjacent stall in
Saturday’s feature sprint.
The connections of Here
De Angels acceded to the stewards’ request on the ground of "the best interests
of racing” and the noted barrier rogue will now start from barrier six with the
gate outside Black Caviar, barrier five, vacant.
But, Australian punters
have revolted against the decision, turning their disgust against Black Caviar,
her trainer Peter Moody and RVL stewards.
Racenet reader Donger
described the decision as "un-Australian”.
"As big as a fan I am of Black Caviar, getting special
treatment because it is a champion racehorse is a bit much and unfair, end of
the day it’s a racehorse and if it draws next to a horse which is known to be
rogue in the barrier then I guess bad luck. Play it as it lies as they say in golf,”
are BG’s thoughts on the decision.
Nige added, "I like most
are a huge Black Caviar fan but what a shame. The draw you get is the draw you
get. It is quite common to scratch a horse due to a poor barrier and if there
is genuine concern scratch her or deal with it. Granted it would be massive
blow to Moonee Valley and to Australian racing in general, but so see a horse
get preferential treatment because of their status is an even bigger blow to
Australian racing.”
"Seriously do not agree
with the special treatment being given. As much as want Black Caviar to win the
rules and conditions should be the same for all,” is what Bundy thinks.
"They're setting a big
precedence, stupid decision,” Mel said while Fossil was short and sweet describing the ruling as "an embarrassment”.
Despite the majority of
feedback against the ruling some punters are in agreement with the decision.
Michael suggested racing officials should look to expand on the decision in the
future.
"Smart move by Racing
Victoria why should any horse be risked by another that has a poor record.
Perhaps this is a sign that the gallops can learn something from the trots. In
the trots bad horses are excluded from the draw so as to not disadvantage other
runners. Something to consider perhaps.”