Authorized
Steward
Group 1 user 18
 Offline
Posts : 19693
|
|
|
 Original Post 2009-May-20, 01:10 PM
|
Watch this performance this is honesty personified an awesome effort. He was fair dinkum 4 wide the entire trip, the jockey could not make up his mind to go forward or back and this bloke still kept coming and won clearly. Obviously the opposition might be questionable but i am willing to say here and now that this is a classic hopeful next season. http://horseracing.bigpond.com/asx/windowsmedia.aspx?TagID=AR473106445618032867
| SO YOU THINK (NZ) |
Bay colt 2006 |
|
High Chaparral
Bay 1999 |
Sadler's Wells
Bay 1981 |
Northern Dancer
Bay 1961 |
Nearctic
Brown 1954 |
Nearco
Lady Angela |
1935
1944 |
4-r
14-c |
Natalma
Bay 1957 |
Native Dancer
Almahmoud |
1950
1947 |
5-f
2-d |
Fairy Bridge
Bay 1975 |
Bold Reason
Bay 1968 |
Hail to Reason
Lalun |
1958
1952 |
4-n
19-b |
Special
Bay 1969 |
Forli
Thong |
1963
1964 |
3-b
5-h |
Kasora
Brown 1993 |
Darshaan
Brown 1981 |
Shirley Heights
Bay 1975 |
Mill Reef
Hardiemma |
1968
1969 |
22-d
1-l |
Delsy
Brown 1972 |
Abdos
Kelty |
1959
1965 |
1-e
13-c |
Kozana
Brown 1982 |
Kris
Chestnut 1976 |
Sharpen Up
Doubly Sure |
1969
1971 |
5-i
2-o |
Koblenza
Brown 1966 |
Hugh Lupus
Kalimara |
1952
1960 |
19>
1-n |
Triassic
Bay 1990 |
Tights
Bay 1981 |
Nijinsky
Bay 1967 |
Northern Dancer
Bay 1961 |
Nearctic
Natalma |
1954
1957 |
14-c
2-d |
Flaming Page
Bay 1959 |
Bull Page
Flaring Top |
1947
1947 |
4-m
8-f |
Dancealot
Bay 1971 |
Round Table
Bay 1954 |
Princequillo
Knight's Daughter |
1940
1941 |
1-b
2-f |
Music Please
Chestnut 1963 |
To Market
Santorin |
1948
1956 |
10-a
16-h |
Astral Row
Brown 1979 |
Long Row
Brown 1970 |
Linacre
Brown 1960 |
Rockefella
True Picture |
1941
1955 |
7-a
15-a |
Front Row
Bay 1965 |
Epaulette
Panaview |
1951
1960 |
15-a
42> |
Pak Bun Bay
Bay 1970 |
Matinee Idol
Bay 1956 |
Pinza
Method |
1950
1951 |
3-i
13-e |
Philipolo
Brown 1960 |
Marco Polo
Philadelphia |
1946
1952 |
1-w
13-a |
|
Ancestor duplications: |
Northern Dancer |
3m x 4m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: 2009-May-20, 02:10 PM by Authorized »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| |
Big Wheel
VIP Club
Group 2 user 269
Offline
Posts : 2156
|
|
|
2009-May-21, 11:34 AM
|
INTERESTING TO hear Dan say that horse is still 6 months off, gee if he is
right the sky is the limit for him hey
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
chalky
VIP Club
Group 2 user 319
Offline
Posts : 2709
|
|
|
2009-May-21, 11:37 AM
|
chalky,he ran the last sections quicker than anything else in the race by
800,3.8l
600,4.6
400,3.5
200,2.3
thats SPECIAL
Shamash seemed to be taking ground of it at the end, did SYT run its last 200 2.3 quicker then this horse? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Big Wheel
VIP Club
Group 2 user 269
Offline
Posts : 2156
|
|
|
2009-May-21, 11:39 AM
|
Shamash seemed to be taking ground of it at the end, did SYT run its last 200 2.3 quicker then this horse?
Yeh true mate however it was entitled to get tired being 1st start & 4 deep thru, & ill give up if Shamash ran faster last 200 |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
chalky
VIP Club
Group 2 user 319
Offline
Posts : 2709
|
|
|
2009-May-21, 11:44 AM
|
Yeh true mate however it was entitled to get tired being 1st start & 4 deep thru, & ill give up if Shamash ran faster last 200
Yeah i agree with it being wide, just cant see how it ran 2.3 faster then the second horse. According to the sectionals from TVN for last 200m SYT 11.84, Shamash 11.69. Interesting to note the second horse also had a faster split from the 600m and 400m. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Da Judge
VIP Club
Group 1 user 408
Offline
Posts : 5557
|
|
|
2009-May-21, 11:47 AM
|
Shamash seemed to be taking ground of it at the end, did SYT run its last 200 2.3 quicker then this horse?
i thought shamash raced at rosehill,but i could be wrong |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
chalky
VIP Club
Group 2 user 319
Offline
Posts : 2709
|
|
|
2009-May-21, 11:52 AM
|
Ive missed something obviously...... As the bloodnut has been known to say, please explain........
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Da Judge
VIP Club
Group 1 user 408
Offline
Posts : 5557
|
|
|
2009-May-21, 11:52 AM
|
my apologies chalky,i  ed up again,the sectionals i gave were for WTR,and not SYT  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
chalky
VIP Club
Group 2 user 319
Offline
Posts : 2709
|
|
|
2009-May-21, 12:00 PM
|
I thought i must have been going mad!! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Da Judge
VIP Club
Group 1 user 408
Offline
Posts : 5557
|
|
|
2009-May-21, 12:07 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Big Wheel
VIP Club
Group 2 user 269
Offline
Posts : 2156
|
|
|
2009-May-21, 12:40 PM
|
Chalky, if your sectionals are right(re rosehill r1) i stand corrected
that Shamash ran faster than So you think, however it didn't look like it 2 me
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Authorized
Steward
Group 1 user 18
Offline
Posts : 19693
|
|
|
2009-May-21, 12:46 PM
|
Chalky, if your sectionals are right(re rosehill r1) i stand corrected
that Shamash ran faster than So you think, however it didn't look like it 2 me
Surely he was entitled to get home better, he had a bludge out the back and has race experience. The winner is a Derby and Cups horse in the making, the other bloke will be a fair saturday conveyance.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Big Wheel
VIP Club
Group 2 user 269
Offline
Posts : 2156
|
|
|
2009-May-21, 12:47 PM
|
Surely he was entitled to get home better, he had a bludge out the back and has race experience. The winner is a Derby and Cups horse in the making, the other bloke will be a fair saturday conveyance. Agree agree agree Auth |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
chalky
VIP Club
Group 2 user 319
Offline
Posts : 2709
|
|
|
2009-May-21, 05:48 PM
|
Chalky, if your sectionals are right(re rosehill r1) i stand corrected
that Shamash ran faster than So you think, however it didn't look like it 2 me
I got the sectionals from the TVN site so i assume they are correct. I have no doubt that the first horse is better then the second horse, but i dint think he is, or will be a freak. I wish i owned him but from that run i cant get overly excited. I know he was wide the whole trip but dont think he showed a blinding turn off foot, more of a grinding win i thought, not overly brilliant. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tevez17
Steward
Group 1 user 159
 Online
Posts : 6437
|
|
|
2009-May-21, 06:04 PM
|
I got the sectionals from the TVN site so i assume they are correct.
I have no doubt that the first horse is better then the second horse, but i dint think he is, or will be a freak. I wish i owned him but from that run i cant get overly excited. I know he was wide the whole trip but dont think he showed a blinding turn off foot, more of a grinding win i thought, not overly brilliant.
Be interesting to see if that improves on top of the ground. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
