Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
2012-Feb-13, 02:22 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Racehorse TALK



Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 8   Go Down
 
Author Topic: Artificial Insemination  (Read 5195 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
InTheKnow
Group 2
user 400
Offline Offline
Posts: 2643
Original Post 2009-Sep-02, 09:23 AM

UK Expert Calls For Artificial Insemination
Professor Twink Allen, the former director of Britain's Thoroughbred Breeders Association Equine Fertility Unit in Newmarket, "has stepped up his campaign for the abolition of the rule banning artificial insemination by hitting out at the big stallion owners" & "claiming they are deliberately standing in the way of what he regards as progress", reported racingpost.com. Allen told the International Breeders Seminar at Somerset West near Cape Town in South Africa: "The stallion owners are frightened of change & a few financially powerful ones simply refuse to discuss AI - and it's the numerically larger but financially smaller mare owners who suffer. A handful of wealthy stallion owners are afraid of it & frightened by a change in the status quo. In their minds, they see their stud farms would diminish or disappear." Allen called the AI ban "antiquated" & declared: "We have gone on too long with this attitude of we are not going to talk about it, go away. We must discuss it. AI reduces the risk of venereal disease, mating injuries & uterine infections. It also cuts down on the amount of labour required. People say that it will lead to the most popular stallions inseminating huge numbers of mares, but that's not going to happen. In the American Standard-bred (trotting) world, where they do use AI, the numbers of mares-per-stallion have actually come down, because breeders don't want to flood the market with too many yearlings by the same sire. The same would happen in the thoroughbred world." (Sep 2)

Allen To Address US Breeders On AI Debate
Professor Twink Allen "intends spreading" his campaign against the AI-ban "around the globe" noted racingpost.com. "In January he will address a large group of American breeders in Kentucky". Allen "is also in touch with Bruce McHugh, the former Sydney Turf Club chairman who is taking the Australian Stud Book to court"; McHugh maintains the anti-AI rule "is a restraint of trade & therefore illegal". Allen summed up: "It is now high time the existing ban on the use of AI & ET in thoroughbred breeding be reviewed in light of the very obvious potential health, welfare & economic benefits." (Sep 2)
Logged
 
Max Manewer
Group 2
user 414
Offline Offline
Posts: 4998
2010-Jan-19, 12:56 PM

the immediate reinforcement of natural service is permitted provided certain stipulations are adhered to.


Meaning ?  chin
Logged
Authorized
Steward
Group 1
user 18
Offline Offline
Posts: 18286
2010-Jan-19, 12:58 PM

Meaning ?  chin


Rape
Logged
Max Manewer
Group 2
user 414
Offline Offline
Posts: 4998
2010-Jan-19, 12:59 PM

Immediate re-inforcement suggests AI is already a reality.
Logged
Authorized
Steward
Group 1
user 18
Offline Offline
Posts: 18286
2010-Jan-19, 01:04 PM

Exactly right, If they were fair dinkum they would stick their stallion in a paddock with the mare they want served by him and hope they like each other.
Logged
Max Manewer
Group 2
user 414
Offline Offline
Posts: 4998
2010-Jan-19, 01:09 PM

Explains why some stallions are covering many more than was the max. a few years ago.
Logged
JWesleyHarding
Group 1
user 231
Offline Offline
Posts: 9362
2010-Jan-19, 02:03 PM

Exactly right, If they were fair dinkum they would stick their stallion in a paddock with the mare they want served by him and hope they like each other.


but wouldn't the bottle of wine, and box of the very best Belgium chocolates, be regarded as re-inforcement?
Logged
wily ole dog
Group 1
user 218
Offline Offline
Posts: 9266
2010-Jan-19, 05:15 PM

Thats an interesting read about the standardbreds.

I'm against AI for many of the reasons stated in the article
Logged
maosanta
Open
user 557
Offline Offline
Posts: 189
2010-Jan-19, 05:26 PM

I wonder how long it will take Alan Jones to get on the anti-AI bandwagon? I tip he'll wait until just before the McHugh hearing is due to start.
Logged
Authorized
Steward
Group 1
user 18
Offline Offline
Posts: 18286
2010-Jan-19, 05:30 PM

I would imagine the fact most, if not all of his horse dealings are throguh Arrowfield, he would be heavily influenced by John Messarra and that would be fair enough wouldn't it ?
Logged
Falcon
Group3
user 454
Offline Offline
Posts: 593
2010-Jan-19, 06:40 PM

I haven't heard one sustainable argument AGAINST artificial insemination for thoroughbreds.


I can see stallions sticking there hooves in the air on this one  smiley
Logged
J.Glenoban
Listed
user 421
Offline Offline
Posts: 335
2010-Jan-29, 11:26 AM

This is from an article at virtual formguide, comments made by Gerry Harvey about AI during the EI drama in 2007.

"If there was AI, this wouldn't be a problem in the breeding business and we wouldn't even have it because these stallions wouldn't have even come into the country,"

"This is a case of the law being a damned nuisance, because if you had a breeding society that said you could only serve 100 or 150 or 200 mares then it would never become a problem."

"You use AI and you save all this stupid business about putting stallions on planes and carting them all around the world."

"I've got no doubt it's only a matter of time before AI becomes the preferred and only way to do it."


Logged
Authorized
Steward
Group 1
user 18
Offline Offline
Posts: 18286
2010-Jan-29, 11:32 AM


"I've got no doubt it's only a matter of time before AI becomes the preferred and only way to do it."



Obviously he has taken no notice of the Stallion Unions thoughts on this.
Logged
J.Glenoban
Listed
user 421
Offline Offline
Posts: 335
2010-Jan-29, 11:52 AM

  biggrin  It'll give them a chance to pursue a monogamous relationship for the first time on their life.

I'm sure they'll find it more fulfilling 
Logged
Falcon
Group3
user 454
Offline Offline
Posts: 593
2010-Jan-29, 06:31 PM

Fastnet Rock certainly covered a lot of mares, 271 in 2009 season
Now he's off to GB, wonder how many mares he can handle up there?

Now there's a horse who might find AI a bit easier on the body  wink

Unreal how many mares some of these stallions cover in a season
Logged
maosanta
Open
user 557
Offline Offline
Posts: 189
2010-Mar-01, 07:24 PM

Some interesting perspectives on this issue: http://formguide.cyberhorse.com.au/index.php/2010020241178/Industry/the-great-ai-debate.html

Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 8   Go Up
 
 
Jump to:  

 - Links - Luxbet Horse Racing Betting - Racenet - Horse Racing - Noms and Acc - QTAB - TAB Horse Racing Betting - Racing and Sports - Horse Racing Only
Powered by SMF 1.1.15 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines
TinyPortal v0.9.8 © Bloc | Adagio design by Bloc