Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
2012-May-28, 09:29 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Racehorse TALK

Pages: 1 ... 12 13 [14] 15 16 ... 45   Go Down
 
Author Topic: Danny Nikolic caught in betting probe  (Read 30376 times)
0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
Steve M
Steward
Group 1
user 59
Offline Offline
Posts: 5587
Original Post 2010-Feb-13, 07:04 AM

Patrick Smith From: The Australian February 13, 2010

A FAMOUS Australian racing family is at the centre of unrelated stewards' probes in two states over betting irregularities.
It is believed Betfair integrity officers noted unusual betting patterns in certain accounts and notified stewards in Melbourne and Queensland.

Betting investigations in Victoria and Queensland have been ramped up after Victorian racing stewards broadened an inquiry into the performance of a horse ridden by leading jockey Danny Nikolic at Mornington last month.

Chief steward Terry Bailey would not comment but it is believed Racing Victoria's integrity team was looking at as many as four recent Nikolic rides. "In fairness to everyone involved I cannot comment any further than to say Nikolic has been told the Mornington inquiry has broadened," Bailey said.

In Queensland, trainer John Nikolic, Danny's brother, yesterday faced stewards again after Baby Boom, a short-priced favourite ridden by jockey John Keating, finished fourth. The stewards report after the race said a post-race veterinary examination of Baby Boom failed to reveal any significant abnormalities. Queensland chief steward Wade Birch confirmed yesterday that unusual trends on betting exchange Betfair drove the initial inquiry.

Start of sidebar. Skip to end of sidebar.
.End of sidebar. Return to start of sidebar.
It is believed this Queensland inquiry may also be broadened to examine several other races which included Nikolic-trained runners. Birch said Queensland racing would be happy to work with Victorian stewards if required.

"At the moment our investigations centre only on the Sunshine Coast race," Birch said.

Bailey would not confirm that different betting patterns on Betfair had drawn the stewards to look at other races in more detail. "We look at all sorts of betting records," Bailey said.

Betfair, an international betting exchange whose Australian base is in Tasmania, allows punters to back horses to lose.

Victorian stewards opened an investigation when odds-on favourite Finishing Card, ridden by Nikolic, was beaten into second place by New Venture in a 1210m maiden at Mornington on January 8. The stewards report on the day said in part: "D Nikolic explained that after jumping from a wide barrier and being caught wide he would have had to restrain to the rear of the field to find cover and therefore allowed the gelding to stride forward."

One newspaper report described the run this way: "The Clinton McDonald-trained Finishing Card drew barrier 13, covered plenty of extra ground and flew home late. New Venture enjoyed a perfect run behind the leader and took advantage of a rails run to win."

Queensland stewards yesterday released a statement after they continued their inquiry into the performance of Baby Boom at the Sunshine Coast on January 3. It read: "Based on information obtained during investigations carried out in respect to betting on the race, the bounds of the inquiry were expanded to include the running and handling of Baby Boom on that day. Of particular concern to stewards was the Betfair activity on the race surrounding Baby Boom which indicated that a large volume of money had been wagered in support of the horse being unsuccessful.

"Trainer John Nikolic and rider John Keating were both questioned immediately following the race and both were directed to appear before the stewards today.

"At today's inquiry, evidence was taken from Mr Nikolic regarding his association with a Gold Coast punter who at this stage has declined requests from stewards to assist in their investigations.

"Mr Nikolic was also asked about the relationship he has with a person believed to be a commission agent based in Melbourne. This person was interviewed by chief steward Wade Birch in Melbourne last week.

"Further evidence was also taken from jockey John Keating who rode Baby Boom on the day in question."

The report concluded saying the inquiry had been adjourned to a time and date to be fixed.

Danny Nikolic, 35, is one of Australia's finest riders, a prolific Group I winner, who has ridden extensively overseas. He won the 2003 Caulfield Cup on Mummify for trainer Lee Freedman. He was stable rider for the prominent Lloyd Williams' team, winning Group Is on Perlin (Doomben Cup, Underwood Stakes) and Reset (Futurity Stakes, Australasian Stakes).

Older brother John had a long stint training in Malaysia before returning to Queensland.

The licensing of betting exchange Betfair in Australia was fought vigorously by the racing establishment. It was seen as a risk to integrity because it was possible to bet on horses to lose. It was also opposed because it was seen as a threat to tote betting which traditionally provided racing's revenue.
Logged
 
Grega9430
Listed
user 267
Offline Offline
Posts: 476
2010-Mar-16, 06:26 PM

Corruption will always be there... no matter what model you use.



Rocky, you are right that corruption will always be there, and that applies to every Industry, but if you don't think that the "business/betting model" in use has an affect on the level of corruption then your head is deeper in the sand than you think my head is.
Logged
Bubbasmith
Group 2
user 197
Offline Offline
Posts: 2296
2010-Mar-16, 06:42 PM

Grega

As I pointed out this will be ground breaking case for Betfair. They have probably been waiting in the wings for this to happen and have produced enough evidence to make the stewards sit up and act. It will only help their business in the long run if it's proven that these individuals have acted corruptly and are punished. The general punting public will have greater confidence in dealing with Betfair.
« Last Edit: 2010-Mar-16, 06:44 PM by Bubbasmith » Logged
governor
Group3
user 169
Offline Offline
Posts: 997
2010-Mar-16, 06:45 PM

grega are you anti exchange?
Logged
ledgerr77
Group3
user 279
Online Online
Posts: 755
2010-Mar-16, 07:17 PM


   A commission agent plies his trade by handling BIG business...it also has to be good business, GOOD business means that when you are betting on mostly credit...the person pays the other end, without any doubt ...the commission agent builds up a rapport by doing his best and by the most being discreet...the people/agencies that would use Clements are BIG players ............if betfair did NOT exist you would have a leading jockey consulting the biggest players in town.........its not the Nikolic/  Clements link their after its who is Clements dealing with @its those accounts that have been triggered by betfairs audit . Grega you are completely wrong, betfair has alerted some odd transactions to a flock of blissfully unaware stewards @ i applaud it 
Logged
richo
Group 2
user 47
Offline Offline
Posts: 1568
2010-Mar-16, 07:31 PM

ledger you may be right betfair may have alerted stewards to some odd transactions but have they caused most of them.
Logged
Bubbasmith
Group 2
user 197
Offline Offline
Posts: 2296
2010-Mar-16, 07:45 PM

Richo

If I sell you alcohol, when you are sober and later you drive under the influence is that my fault ?

If people are going to drive over .05 or cheat on horses races they will do it any way they can . Betfair might look the easy way to do it, but if this case is proven, and individuals are punished, not only by the stewards, but by higher authorities  I do not think too many will consider it down the track.

The window of opportunity  on Betfaiir  for corruption might have just about closed.



Logged
JWesleyHarding
Group 1
user 231
Offline Offline
Posts: 10314
2010-Mar-16, 08:26 PM

Still can't believe in this Day & Age, that Danny would not be using a
cheap pre paid phone, or even easier a Pre paid Sim card,
Cmon Dan i thought you were smarter than that nowink


My first reaction was the he had nothing to hid.

Seems to me to be evidence supporting his contention of innocence, rather than his guilt.

Maybe I'm wrong, but then maybe not.
Logged
Wenona
VIP Club
Group 2
user 175
Offline Offline
Posts: 4355
2010-Mar-16, 08:32 PM

People have been stopping horses from the beginning of time, it didn't start with Betfair.

I remember hearing Roy Higgins tell a story about how as an apprentice he actually jumped off one in the run because it was going to win and he was told he was to win under no circumstances.

Do you really think there's never been a trotting driver who's had an agreement with a bookmaker relating to odds on runners galloping at the start?  wink

Even with Betfair, the games probably more honest than it was 20 years ago.

Logged
Fastnet Rock
Group3
user 833
Offline Offline
Posts: 676
2010-Mar-16, 08:39 PM

People have been stopping horses from the beginning of time, it didn't start with Betfair.

I remember hearing Roy Higgins tell a story about how as an apprentice he actually jumped off one in the run because it was going to win and he was told he was to win under no circumstances.

Do you really think there's never been a trotting driver who's had an agreement with a bookmaker relating to odds on runners galloping at the start?  wink

Even with Betfair, the games probably more honest than it was 20 years ago.



  noteworthy

Logged
J.Glenoban
Listed
user 421
Offline Offline
Posts: 340
2010-Mar-16, 09:13 PM

The issue does highlight how the landscape has changed in Australia in relation to Betfair.
If this had happened 5 years ago just about every major racing body in the country would have used the situation to renew their call for betting exchanges to be banned.


Logged
Bubbasmith
Group 2
user 197
Offline Offline
Posts: 2296
2010-Mar-16, 09:26 PM

JG, You are right about the changing landscape. Andrew Harding, Andrew Ramsden, both at the time office bearers of Aust Racing Board and the irrespressible Robert Nason, then RVL CEO ,then Tabcorp Wagering Executive, now Telstra Executive, would have been banging on the door of every newspaper in Australia wanting Betfair outlawed nation-wide.

BTW I wonder what's Nason's thoughts  are on the ALP's planned National Broadband Network ?
« Last Edit: 2010-Mar-16, 09:29 PM by Bubbasmith » Logged
richo
Group 2
user 47
Offline Offline
Posts: 1568
2010-Mar-16, 09:54 PM

plenty of publicans will argue with bubba a lot have been held accountable for  drunks i still think when you can back a horse to lose it opens the door for more tricks you can't compare 20 years ago to now prizemoney then was shit and jockeys pay was shit and a lot of cheating went just get a living  now prizemonies a lot better and jocks wages are good so the best payday should be by backing a winner not a loser
Logged
luvtheponies
Open
user 595
Offline Offline
Posts: 166
2010-Mar-17, 12:01 AM

People have been stopping horses from the beginning of time, it didn't start with Betfair.

I remember hearing Roy Higgins tell a story about how as an apprentice he actually jumped off one in the run because it was going to win and he was told he was to win under no circumstances.

Do you really think there's never been a trotting driver who's had an agreement with a bookmaker relating to odds on runners galloping at the start?  wink

Even with Betfair, the games probably more honest than it was 20 years ago.




Sure the game may be cleaner than it was 20 years ago.

Problem is it's almost impossible to convict a jockey of pulling one up - either through the court of law or the horse racing authorities.

Witness Fallon et al in UK.

IMHO Nikolic is as guilty as sin but very unlikely he can be convicted of anything by the racing authorities or the law of the land.

What would it take for a jockey to be caught red-handed/in flagrante in such a matter?

When was the last such conviction?  Munce and then who?
Logged
Grega9430
Listed
user 267
Offline Offline
Posts: 476
2010-Mar-17, 06:09 AM

grega are you anti exchange?


Governor, I actually like the concept but my concerns with it are;

It facilitates corruption far more easily than any other betting models

In my view they don't pay enough to the Industry for Racing Product;

And to get a license in Australia they utilised a loophole and lied to the Tasmanian Govt and its Racing Industry by promising significant funding of which they have achieved less than 20% of this promise on an annual basis.

Gov, who or what is a Becks boy?
Logged
Wenona
VIP Club
Group 2
user 175
Offline Offline
Posts: 4355
2010-Mar-17, 06:42 AM


Witness Fallon et al in UK.




That prosecution was a joke from day one.

I can't remember the exact numbers but it was something like they said he was supposed to pull up 30 odd runners yet 12 of those actually won. what


And the star witness had to admit he didn't know the actual rules of UK racing.   bash
« Last Edit: 2010-Mar-17, 06:45 AM by Wenona » Logged
Pages: 1 ... 12 13 [14] 15 16 ... 45   Go Up
 
 
Jump to:  

 - Links - Luxbet Horse Racing Betting - Racenet - Horse Racing - Noms and Acc - QTAB - TAB Horse Racing Betting - Racing and Sports - Horse Racing Only
Powered by SMF 1.1.15 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines
TinyPortal v0.9.8 © Bloc | Adagio design by Bloc