Randwick Guineas - 2010 - #1 Horse Racing Forum in Australia for Race-Horse News

westie

Editor
Group 1
user 8

Offline
Posts: 8813

Original Post 2010-Mar-08, 11:47 AM

6 - 4.10PM - ROYAL RANDWICK GUINEAS - 1600 METRES

Of $350000 and $2400 trophies. 1st $210000 and trophies of $1700 to owner $350 to trainer $350 to jockey, 2nd $66500, 3rd $33300, 4th $15800, 5th $8800, 6th $5200, 7th $5200, 8th $5200. Starter Subsidy: $200 for non-prize earning runners. For Three-Years-Old. Set Weights. (GROUP 1). No Allowances for apprentices. Field Limit: 20 + 4 EM

No	Horse	Trainer	Jockey	Barrier	Weight	Handicapper Rating
1	KIDNAPPED	Peter Snowden	Joshua Parr	9	56.5	97
2	MONTON	Tim Martin	Jay Ford	16	56.5	95
3	HANKS	Peter G Moody	Damien Oliver	7	56.5	94
4	SHOOT OUT	John Wallace	Stathi Katsidis	5	56.5	94
5	MORE THAN GREAT	David Payne	Brad Pengelly	8	56.5	92
6	VIKING LEGEND	Gai Waterhouse	Brad Rawiller	1	56.5	92
7	CAPTAIN SONADOR	Roger Milne	Scott Seamer	6	56.5	88
8	DELAGO BOLT	Gary Portelli	Nathan Berry (a)	14	56.5	87
9	GATHERING	John P Thompson	Jim Cassidy	11	56.5	86
10	SIR HALLOWELL	David Harrison	Patrick Carbery	3	56.5	85
11	COSMOCRAT	Mick Price	Blake Shinn	10	56.5	75
12	SAINT ENCOSTA	John P Thompson	Tim Clark	13	56.5	73
13	ZABRASIVE (NZ)	John O'Shea	Hugh Bowman	15	56.5	69
14	THE COMEDIAN	Lee Freedman	Glyn Schofield	17	56.5	68
15	LEICESTER SQUARE	Paul Messara	Daniel Ganderton (a)	12	56.5	61
16	RUN FOR NAARA	John P Thompson	Chris Munce	4	54.5	88
17	INDIAN OCEAN	Tim Martin	Tye Angland	2	54.5	84

New Page

Sportsbet No	Runner	Win	Place
63174	SHOOT OUT	4	1.75
63173	HANKS	9	3
63180	SIR HALLOWELL	9	3
63176	VIKING LEGEND	10	3.25
63171	KIDNAPPED	10	3.25
63177	CAPTAIN SONADOR	11	3.5
63183	ZABRASIVE	12	3.75
63172	MONTON	15	4.5
63181	COSMOCRAT	17	5
63186	RUN FOR NAARA	18	5.25
63185	LEICESTER SQUARE	18	5.25
63187	INDIAN OCEAN	18	5.25
63184	THE COMEDIAN	21	6
63175	MORE THAN GREAT	23	6.5
63178	DELAGO BOLT	35	9.5
63179	GATHERING	81	21
63182	SAINT ENCOSTA	126	32.25
As at 10 March 2010


« Last Edit: 2010-Mar-10, 09:11 PM by westie »	Logged

Antitab#

Group 2
user 234

Offline
Posts: 1655

2010-Mar-08, 11:54 AM

Hanks is an interesting nom.

This looks an easier race for him than the one he is already in on Saturday.


	Logged

governor

Group3
user 169
Offline

Offline
Posts: 996

2010-Mar-08, 12:06 PM

shouldnt have two Group 1 miles for the 3yo's run one week apart, let alone this year on the same day.

poor programming again. Thumb Down


	Logged

Authorized

Steward
Group 1
user 18

Online
Posts: 18237

2010-Mar-08, 04:25 PM

Its got me stuffed how this race had group 1 status from it very first running.

If you take Denman out of the Flemington race, which one is the better ?


	Logged

sobig

Group 2
user 583
Offline

Offline
Posts: 1273

2010-Mar-08, 04:28 PM

The reason it had group1 status from the first running is it is a replacement for the group1 Canterbury Guineas.


	Logged

Authorized

Steward
Group 1
user 18

Online
Posts: 18237

2010-Mar-08, 04:29 PM

sobig writes ... 2010-Mar-08, 04:28 PM

The reason it had group1 status from the first running is it is a replacement for the group1 Canterbury Guineas.

The Golden Rose was a replacement for a group 2 race thats name escapes me and it had to start from scratch.


	Logged

Steve M

Steward
Group 1
user 59

Offline
Posts: 5156

2010-Mar-08, 05:18 PM

I think the interesting nom is Set For Fame...now they wanted a Group 1 with her and they were heading to Sydney anyway.

If you wanted a G1 and you could run in both - which race would you run in...unless $$$ is your No 1 lure you'd run here. Wish I could get money on that option. Madness not to.

Only prob is...I backed her in a double with the Aust Guineas as first leg :_(


	Logged

Tevez17

Steward
Group 1
user 159

Online
Posts: 6283

2010-Mar-08, 05:25 PM

If the noms fall away abit CAPTAIN SONADOR is above average


	Logged

Mark

Group 1
user 489
Offline

Offline
Posts: 9802

2010-Mar-08, 07:58 PM

Steve M writes ... 2010-Mar-08, 05:18 PM

Steve, its all good, she's still going for the Aus Guineas mate thumbsup


	Logged

Steve M

Steward
Group 1
user 59

Offline
Posts: 5156

2010-Mar-08, 08:27 PM

Thanks Mark beer


	Logged

PoisonPen7

Steward
Group 1
user 55

Online
Posts: 5432

2010-Mar-08, 11:26 PM

Authorized writes ... 2010-Mar-08, 04:29 PM

The Golden Rose was a replacement for a group 2 race thats name escapes me and it had to start from scratch.

Peter Pan Stks I think it was Matt...was run over 1500m.


	Logged

Authorized

Steward
Group 1
user 18

Online
Posts: 18237

2010-Mar-09, 10:07 AM

Thats the one. Thumb Up

What a shame the great Peter Pan does not have a race named in his honor.


	Logged

governor

Group3
user 169
Offline

Offline
Posts: 996

2010-Mar-09, 12:48 PM

I dont think it was the correct decsion either as the Peter Pan was open to allcomers (3yo's) whereas the Golden Rose is a restricted event.


	Logged

Authorized

Steward
Group 1
user 18

Online
Posts: 18237

2010-Mar-09, 12:54 PM

governor writes ... 2010-Mar-09, 12:48 PM

I dont think it was the correct decsion either as the Peter Pan was open to allcomers (3yo's) whereas the Golden Rose is a restricted event.

Its not really resticted, People can enter when they enter for the Slipper and I am sure there are provisions for late entries.


	Logged

governor

Group3
user 169
Offline

Offline
Posts: 996

2010-Mar-09, 01:25 PM

have to be an original nom for the slipper, im unaware of late entry clause.


	Logged

Pages: [1] 2 Go Up

« previous next »

Racehorse TALK