Response to doubledee - Blogs - Racehorse TALK harm-plan

Racehorse TALK



Response to doubledee - Blogs - Racehorse TALK

Author Topic: Response to doubledee  (Read 2091 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Bluepav

  • Guest
O.P. « 2016-Jun-17, 02:03 PM »
.
Removed
« Last Edit: 2016-Jun-17, 02:28 PM by MagiC~* »

Offline MagiC~*

  • Admin
  • Group 1
  • User 2
  • *****
  • Posts: 14294
« 2016-Jun-17, 02:24 PM Reply #1 »
Best be clear here bluepav, as stated previously, we do not relate peoples contributions on this forum to their roles outside of this forum.

We have many people on this forum with roles in all sorts of industry positions and their comments and or their position on certain subjects is a personal opinion and has nil to do with any position they hold outside of their involvement on this forum.

If you continue to insinuate and or threaten members of this forum regarding their roles outside of the forum, then I suggest you rethink your position.

If you want to criticise an organisation, fair enough, but to personally attack a member of this forum due to his or her   roles outside of this forum you will find yourself moderated and or removed.

Members have every right to criticise organisations, as do you, but what we will not tolerate is other members attacking each other.

Offline Ascot

  • Group 1
  • User 202
  • Posts: 5883
« 2016-Jun-17, 02:47 PM Reply #2 »
For the few people who might have sighted the now deleted post above in which I was defamed, I can assure all that the claims made or inferred about me were totally (100%) without foundation.  I suggest that people who infer some conspiracy has occurred where there is none reconsider directing their angst elsewhere.  The post was threatening, grossly erroneous and libellous.  I thank MagiC for his prompt action in removing it.

Online wily ole dog

  • Group 1
  • User 218
  • Posts: 26215
« 2016-Jun-17, 06:28 PM Reply #3 »
Bugger, I missed it  :lol:

Offline dubbledee

  • VIP Club
  • Group 1
  • User 285
  • Posts: 34011
« 2016-Jun-17, 06:31 PM Reply #4 »
Bugger, I missed it   :lol:
Yep, me too.

I was at Eagle Farm mowing the grass.

I hear bluepav was last seen skulking back into its hole under the cover of darkness.   :lol:

Online jfc

  • Group 1
  • User 723
  • Posts: 6932
« 2016-Jun-17, 06:58 PM Reply #5 »
Yep, me too.

I was at Eagle Farm mowing the grass.

I hear bluepav was last seen skulking back into its hole under the cover of darkness.    :lol:

I did read it, and failed to find anything objectionable or defamatory.

Threats! Must have been exceedingly subtle.

As for these rules which get trotted out when expedient.

Surely they should apply for everybody?

Clearly they don't.


Offline napes

  • VIP Club
  • Group3
  • User 29
  • Posts: 830
« 2016-Jun-17, 07:12 PM Reply #6 »
What a load of  :crap:

DD's dislike of PP is plain for anyone to see (or read) and the comment made was no more objectionable than many of his comments on the Just Racing thread.

If you people continue to threaten and bully new posters on the site it won't be long and you will only have yourselves to fight with.

Online wily ole dog

  • Group 1
  • User 218
  • Posts: 26215
« 2016-Jun-17, 07:43 PM Reply #7 »
That may well be true napes but as a first post????
He was as unlikely to contribute to this place
« Last Edit: 2016-Jun-17, 08:15 PM by wily ole dog »

Offline Spudda028

  • Group 2
  • User 199
  • Posts: 4888
« 2016-Jun-17, 07:46 PM Reply #8 »
And so napes is PP a forum member?? Did you not read Magic's post>

Offline napes

  • VIP Club
  • Group3
  • User 29
  • Posts: 830
« 2016-Jun-17, 08:08 PM Reply #9 »
Read it, didn't agree with it.

The poster may have never become a regular contributor, but now, like so many before him, he definitely won't.

Offline MagiC~*

  • Admin
  • Group 1
  • User 2
  • *****
  • Posts: 14294
« 2016-Jun-17, 08:21 PM Reply #10 »
I don't think you read the post napes ?

When it comes to members, attack the ball not the person.

Personal attacks are unacceptable, if dd or anybody else for that matter personally attacks a member new or old, that post will be removed.

If you have issues with a post because it is an attack or inflammatory, report it, and it will be actioned.

There were two people attacked in the op and the poster signed up for that intention exclusively, not to contribute.
« Last Edit: 2016-Jun-17, 08:22 PM by MagiC~* »

Offline napes

  • VIP Club
  • Group3
  • User 29
  • Posts: 830
« 2016-Jun-17, 08:31 PM Reply #11 »
I read the post, didn't see much in it. As someone looking in occasionally without getting too involved, anyone who couldn't see DD's vendetta against PP wasn't reading the site. I don't know either of the people involved but the posters advice made sense to me.

I thought you played it well when you warned the poster but left the post up, but then the post was deleted later.

Offline MagiC~*

  • Admin
  • Group 1
  • User 2
  • *****
  • Posts: 14294
« 2016-Jun-17, 08:36 PM Reply #12 »
I deleted it after I wrote my post, I always intended on removing it

Offline Arsenal

  • VIP Club
  • Group 1
  • User 194
  • Posts: 15788
« 2016-Jun-17, 10:25 PM Reply #13 »

I read the post, didn't see much in it. As someone looking in occasionally without getting too involved, anyone who couldn't see DD's vendetta against PP wasn't reading the site. I don't know either of the people involved but the posters advice made sense to me.

I thought you played it well when you warned the poster but left the post up, but then the post was deleted later.

I agree with Napes......if dubbles was offended he could complain .........it was more personal towards him than acceptable  but hardly defamatory.... Ascot on the other hand claims victim status yet he's practically a bystander ..... his expose on Stradbroke day was much worse IMO :bye:


Giddy Up :beer:   

Offline chalky

  • VIP Club
  • Group 1
  • User 319
  • Posts: 5227
« 2016-Jun-18, 12:30 PM Reply #14 »
I read the post and to be honest couldn't really get my head around what it was on about. One thought that did come to mind was that Bluepav was ok to have a go at others on a personal level but failed to identify themselves. Anyway I am sure those it was aimed at are big enough to look after themselves.

Offline dubbledee

  • VIP Club
  • Group 1
  • User 285
  • Posts: 34011
« 2016-Jun-18, 04:19 PM Reply #15 »
Yes, chalks.

A wise person once said "ANONYMITY IS THE COWARD'S ONLY FRIEND".

We see evidence of that regularly on the nightly News, and of late on this forum.


BACK TO ALL TOPICS
Sitemap