That'll about do me for Perth racing, yet another one goer in race 4, the winner of the maiden Quickie, in a 15 horse field from a wide barrier (13) slotted in one out one back, leader a $6 chance got blowtorched in the run by a roughie and capitulated as expected, the chosen one Quickie swept to the lead and won like a $1.20 chance (
was $7 late in betting and paid $4.10) I had 6 runners involved in my bets, the nearest any of them came was the fav (4th) the 2nd and 3rd horses were double gutsers about $30 each

The race before, the Pontiff rode the $1.50 fav and in a 7 horse field it struggled into 3rd (i had it in a couple of exactas to run 2nd as you would) I'm totally out of my depth at this caper now, horses i used to lay with consistent form like Quickie and Hollywierd (winner Doomben race 6) are mostly winning these days, it matters not if they are "unders" they simply lob. I thought that consistent horses pay a weight penalty, it doesn't seem to matter anymore

The bigger the field the bigger the certainty, the smaller the field, the bigger the
UNcertainty

race 5 Bunbury the same story, big field, the short fav wins, 60/1 shot 2nd and a 25/1 shot runs 3rd. It's all too hard
