BANDWAGON SPRUIKERS - Racing Talk - Racehorse TALK harm-plan

Racehorse TALK



BANDWAGON SPRUIKERS - Racing Talk - Racehorse TALK

Author Topic: BANDWAGON SPRUIKERS  (Read 2980 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline nemisis

  • Group 2
  • User 2461
  • Posts: 1086
« 2020-May-17, 04:08 PM Reply #25 »
I don't take any notice at all of any tipsters, anywhere Fours and that includes here and you!

What I did notice was the reaction from the Racing.com crew after the win of Chapel City......the result was not quite the result they had in mind and they took a bit of a shot at the horse.

Wouldn't you love to own a horse like this......especially if you believed in him.......would feel great!

Offline fours

  • Group 1
  • User 704
  • Posts: 6613
« 2020-May-17, 04:32 PM Reply #26 »
Good to hear nemisis!

Chapel City and plenty of other horses like Black Heart Bart that have a period of under performance ( apparent anyway... ) before coming good again provide the keys to the vault!

The fence post types keep the bookies in their mercedes...... 95% of the time.

Many shares provide similar opportunites.

Fours



Offline wily ole dog

  • Group 1
  • User 218
  • Posts: 27207
« 2020-May-17, 08:01 PM Reply #27 »
As usual Mair sits in judgment of others without offering up anything but more evidence of his narcissistic behaviour  :thumbsup:

Offline Peter Mair

  • Group 1
  • User 326
  • Posts: 5231
« 2020-May-17, 10:06 PM Reply #28 »



..................    well said Oedipus

Offline wily ole dog

  • Group 1
  • User 218
  • Posts: 27207
« 2020-May-18, 07:55 AM Reply #29 »
Glad you agree with me that you’re a narcissist  :thumbsup:

As to your fetish for your mother.....or father, I suggest you talk to your shrink rather than disclose it here

Offline Peter Mair

  • Group 1
  • User 326
  • Posts: 5231
« 2020-May-18, 08:20 PM Reply #30 »
 

FAKE 'NEWS' ABOUT AN EMPTY CUP

The news-corpse media virus owns both 'racenet.com' and 'punters.com' -- today we get contrived and conflicted confetti paraded as 'news'.

.......... if these writers are paid as 'racing industry journalists'   ...........could we please have some professional attention to pressing industry issues ...... or some public-confession of the specifics of the 'blinkers' and 'tongue ties' their trainers require them to wear.

Could the Melbourne Cup be run before the Caulfield Cup?

https://www.racenet.com.au/news/could-the-melbourne-cup-be-run-before-the-caulfield-cup-20200518

Spring uncertainty but Melbourne Cup date unchanged

https://www.punters.com.au/news/spring-uncertainty-but-cup-date-unchanged-_190789/

Offline Peter Mair

  • Group 1
  • User 326
  • Posts: 5231
« 2020-May-25, 09:37 AM Reply #31 »


Two horse racing in Hong Kong -- don't you believe it!


Somehow an illusion has racing in Hong Kong being  'best in the world' -- an illusion  endorsed by media preoccupation with magic-men.

On the face of it racing in Hong Kong is about a race between the two jockeys having first pick of the runners (or being picked first to ride the best). Check this pandering to the illusion:

https://www.racenet.com.au/news/zac-purton-involved-in-pre-race-incident-then-wins-group-i-20200524

The fuller story, not being told, is that HK racing is a bit like Pike's Perth -- betting markets are distorted by money for the favored jockeys' runners, punters take the 'unders' and hope.

........ hope is not a winning strategy......especially when the fields are inflated with 'no-hopers', as indicated by the odds. The racing is unfair.

..... call up yesterday's results for Shatin with 14-starter races,

https://www.tab.com.au/racing/2020-05-24/SHA-TIN/E/R/3/Win


Scroll down to the SP odds for runners that did not win -- 100/1 is not the limit of the nonsense on display....... starters are on offer at 200/1, 300/1, 400/1 and 500/1.

Check the race replays -- these runners are like rocks on the track, pin-ball 'bumpers' only able to contribute a random element to the outcome.

https://racing.hkjc.com/racing/english/showcase/showcase.asp

..........I am well and truly over the idea that HK racing is fair ...... more worst than best ......... the truth should be told ..... and repeated for Australia as appropriate .. and it is appropriate.

We know the truth will not be told -- that is the sure bet.
 


Offline fours

  • Group 1
  • User 704
  • Posts: 6613
« 2020-May-25, 09:52 AM Reply #32 »
IDIOT

How can Purton and Moreira possibly win so often if the big fields cause the claimed interference from no hopers getting in the way as you claim?

Your very own arguments prove earlier claims to be wrong.

Fours


Offline Peter Mair

  • Group 1
  • User 326
  • Posts: 5231
« 2020-May-25, 10:06 AM Reply #33 »


There is more to a race than the winners -- and the magic-men do not win every race


Offline Peter Mair

  • Group 1
  • User 326
  • Posts: 5231
« 2020-May-26, 09:27 PM Reply #34 »

This is 'bandwagon' nonsense


STRADBROKE NEXT MISSION

Victorem crashed through the $2m prizemoney barrier with his win in the Victory Stakes at Eagle Farm. Not bad for a horse who was sold for $65,000 at the 2016 Magic Millions two-year-olds in training sale.

It was also not a bad effort by his trainer Jenny Graham either and Jenny is as good a horse person as there is.

On his day the son of I Am Invincible is absolutely explosive and he is now on the second line of betting with Dawn Passage behind Trekking in Stradbroke markets.

Victorem is one of those horses who needs the breaks to go his way, but if everything is on song on Saturday week he’ll be right in the thick of the action.

Offline wily ole dog

  • Group 1
  • User 218
  • Posts: 27207
« 2020-May-26, 09:40 PM Reply #35 »
What’s ya problem with that?

Offline Dave

  • Group 2
  • User 2322
  • Posts: 1138
« 2020-May-26, 09:51 PM Reply #36 »
Racing has been going on in Australia for nigh on 200 years, some favourites losing and some Roughies winning is what keeps the game going, if every fav won there would be NO Bookies and No Bookies = NO punters and No Punters = No prizemoney and No Prizemoney = No racing.....so Thank Christ Peter wasn't around 200 years ago, racing would have been stillborn!
They do not race in lanes and never have. it is constant change for self interest that is bringing racing down.....not big fields....actually any punter with any idea(which rules Pete out) knows big fields make for fairer racing, races are more evenly run.....and handicaps make for fairer racing as the pace is usually on from go to whoa, if a Horse is good enough it will win...I backed a horse yesterday ridden by Bowman in a field of 5 and he found himself in a Pocket and couldn't get out until too late, no doubt he should have won....in a field of 16 with the pace on runs come as the leaders tire and wander around, he would have won easily
Pete do you remember the 1939 Rawson stakes, I will give you a hint.....it had a field of 3 and the fave was beaten!!
Be careful what you wish for....you might get it....Then we'd have to kill you! (kidding)


BACK TO ALL TOPICS
Sitemap