The early quadrella paid some $25 k

The F4 dividends on races 3,4,5&6 were $5.5k, 7k 7k &40k.

....... most punters did not win on those races.

The quadrella was Ok -- only I knew that Voodoo Lad was the lay of the day.

I outlaid $20 on the Melbourne Quaddie but only got $16 back. At least I am satisfied with the knowledge that the integrity of the quaddie races passed the "Mair Pub Test"   

It’s also noted Mair hasn’t been able to tell us what races and horses were affected by his supposed inflated fields.

He’s been exposed as being full of shite again

Well Pete I hope you are right, I will be backing a couple of roughies in both races.....but is you are that is only because punters are not very b-r-i-t-e..........big fields are great to bet in, there is a lot of "mug" money in the pool and for that I would like to say THANKS Pete

Best wishes Dave

The point to not be missed is that the outcome of inflated-field races is beyond the ken of those expecting the form guide to be useful and those expecting the form guide to be useless.

.......... only on Sunday morning does calm reflection show how what did happen was, incredibly,  predictable enough but overlooked by almost all on Friday.

Pete if you and most punters were a detectives criminals would run rampant, unless they came up to you and confessed you would struggle to catch a jaywalker!!! Punting is like being a master detective trying to find a really smart murderer, there are not always a trail of bread crumbs leading you straight to a winner or a murderer....if winning was that easy every winner would be the same price as Winx, who would want that?.....you need to look for clues, sometimes they are subtle, sometimes they hit you in the face so even you could see them.....but the satisfaction you get from finding the subtle clues far outweighs the obvious ones.........people like you are either too lazy or too stupid to look under the surface for clues........but just finding clues is not the answer to winning on the punt.....you have to evaluate them, give them a value i.e. a price....once you learn how to do that, you will be well on the way to being a winning punter.....
You have had this explained to you many times, why are you still beating this drum? Are you obsessed with losing, are you a masochist by nature??, you are the definition of a Masochist...........you keep saying something won't work and you can't win doing it.....but you keep doing it??? is that crazy or what? if you are going to continue to punt, I have an idea that might interest you........learn how!

Caulfield quadrella wreckers for Saturday

Race 6, over 1100m for 3yro fillies, has a field of 16 + 3 emergencies -- and giving it 'G3' status is hardly sensible for a race likely to be another 'wait for it' event.

Even the main event -- aG2 over 1400m with 16 accepting --  is an invitation to a dance macabre.

Why would RVL do this?

Oh well Peter. You don’t learn do you.

Monty told  you to throw 5 darts not 4.

Sadly for you all 4 were wrong, again

R4.....as discussed above, you were wrong
R6 sees the crowds favourite, Sunlight salute
R8 sees the 5-1 shot win and it was not your predicted “dance macabre”
4th dart peter, not a quaddy wrecker in sight. Quad paid a paltry $380

Mair goes home wrong but punters overjoyed 

Dave, Mairs problem is that if he ever raises a good point he ruins it by applying blanket coverage.
The bloke has zero balance.
Of course barriers matter at times but you just can’t  put a line through all of them without doing the form.
Mair fails on both fronts. Form & balance

Pace of the race,  distance, horses racing style, track conditions, what has drawn the “supposed better barriers” and a thing called track bias.

Mair takes none of those factors into consideration and it’s why his theories are constantly proved wrong

That’s the best you’ve got  

There’s only one thing your beating is yourself

What a (not) good idea

Maybe the best way -- at Moonee Valley -- would be to leave the rail in one position and let the jockeys find the best ground for themselves

................. except that the inside would soon be worn out.

The best way would limit field sizes so those accepted get a fair go.



The leader bias at Moonee Valley on Saturday was obvious for all to see as eight of the nine winners were in the first two around the corner ...

The Moonee Valley problem is that as soon as the rail gets out to four metres, where it was on Saturday, the leaders gain even more of an advantage.

.

Punters are vulnerable

...................... most are addicted to betting on Saturday.

RVL taking advantage of addicts is to be deplored.

Addicted punters will roll up to be exploited........  ending  their exploitation depends on RVL deciding to not exploit them.

Imagine if Judge Hayne investigated RVL after he has finished with the banks.

Culling inflated fields

The consequences of paying generous prize-money for running 10th are ever more evident.

Race 8 at Rosehill -- a BM88 over 1100m -- has 16 starters and half of those are listed with pre-post odds of 25/1 and more.

Race 2 -- a Highway Robbery over 1200m -- has 17 of the 20 acceptors still in the field and 10 of those are 25/1 or more in the pre-post market.

Surely fair play demands that, for fields of more than 10 acceptors, those unable to be given any meaningful chance should be scratched -- i.e. if their SP with 10 minutes to go is 25/1 or more they just go home.

Surely fair play demands that, for fields of more than 10 acceptors, those unable to be given any meaningful chance should be scratched -- i.e. if their SP with 10 minutes to go is 25/1 or more they just go home.

Ducking hell! That’s the biggest brain fart you’ve ever come up with

You’re clueless