Inflated fields assessing the consequences about to unfold - Racing Talk - Racehorse TALK   harm-plan

Racehorse TALK



Inflated fields assessing the consequences about to unfold - Racing Talk - Racehorse TALK

Author Topic: Inflated fields assessing the consequences about to unfold  (Read 19041 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Peter Mair

  • Group 2
  • User 326
  • Posts: 4498
« 2019-Mar-17, 09:25 AM Reply #175 »

Inflated fields are spoiling the game

Saturday will illustrate the story:  4 dire-strait races -- 2 each of 1400&1600m races with inflated fields of 16 -- and a 2000m race with 16 starters.

Saturday did tell the story -- 20 starters in low-grade BM 80 races make for a mess -- as do dire-strait races for 2yro fillies.

Sydney racing was better -- but 20 starters in a G1 over 1500 m at Rosehill is a plan for a $200,000 F4 dividend.

.......... punters must be getting the message -- week after week in Melbourne!


Online fours

  • Group 1
  • User 704
  • Posts: 5679
« 2019-Mar-17, 09:29 AM Reply #176 »
Peter,

Why aren't you making a killing every week?

You could be laying the shorties in all these fields PLUS

taking the 200g combos only in the first four and quaddies to clean up at very little expense.

Unless of course you don't believe your own spiel.

Fours

Offline Peter Mair

  • Group 2
  • User 326
  • Posts: 4498
« 2019-Mar-18, 09:52 AM Reply #177 »


Why aren't you making a killing every week?

.................... same reason as you and most others.

It is not about the winning odds being short or long -- rather it is the irrelevance of the form guide to the outcomes and the opportunities this opens for one 'to be got ready' and smoked in without any qualifying restraints.

.............. the MN carnival has seen some stunts pulled off undercover of 'inflated fields'.


Offline wily ole dog

  • Group 1
  • User 218
  • Posts: 25962
« 2019-Mar-18, 10:27 AM Reply #178 »
The formguide is not irrelevant it's that you don't use it :tin:

Offline Peter Mair

  • Group 2
  • User 326
  • Posts: 4498
« 2019-Mar-18, 09:01 PM Reply #179 »

Modest punters would not be happy


...........even the wily one must be having second thoughts about 'inflated fields' delivering rough results and providing the cover for one smoked in, to run well, in defiance of the form guide.

I can understand me missing clues in the form guide but long-odds winners suggest almost all others missed read it also.


Offline Peter Mair

  • Group 2
  • User 326
  • Posts: 4498
« 2019-Mar-19, 08:49 AM Reply #181 »


Please remind me of the question?

Offline Peter Mair

  • Group 2
  • User 326
  • Posts: 4498
« 2019-Mar-19, 12:09 PM Reply #182 »

RVL on the slippery slope?

Situations unfold unevenly and in complex ways.

I have a real allergy to the Racing.com broadcast presenters -- simply could not watch a 'get on' become 'get-off'.

The news that David Gately no longer fits in that RVL culture is not surprising -- and I would also be pleased to see NSW welcome back Brent Zerafra.

............ one very welcome exposure would be the 'presenter guidelines' given to R.Com presenters................. there do seem to be tight restrictions on any allusions to tips gone astray and punters expectations being unfairly disappointed.


Offline wily ole dog

  • Group 1
  • User 218
  • Posts: 25962
« 2019-Mar-19, 12:56 PM Reply #183 »

Please remind me of the question?

Watch the 2links and tell me why the winner started at $41


BACK TO ALL TOPICS
Sitemap