Inflated fields – assessing the consequences about to unfold - Racing Talk - Racehorse TALK
harm-plan
harm-plan

Racehorse TALK



Inflated fields – assessing the consequences about to unfold - Racing Talk - Racehorse TALK

Author Topic: Inflated fields – assessing the consequences about to unfold  (Read 59045 times)

1 Member and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

Online JWesleyHarding

  • Group 1
  • User 231
  • Posts: 19662
« 2020-Mar-20, 09:12 PM Reply #475 »

...... another rough night at the 'vale of tears'

..... the first and last took most punters out of otherwise confident quadrella bets

I

The winner of the first was having its first start after a spell.

At its previous first-up runs it had 3 runs for 2 wins and a 1 second.

And it was tipped in the forum's  Weekday comp by Specialweek.


Offline Peter Mair

  • Group 1
  • User 326
  • Posts: 5088
« 2020-Mar-20, 09:26 PM Reply #476 »


......that may well be so,

................ the reality, alas, is that 'no one' considered it a genuine winning chance.......and had no good reason to.

Online sobig

  • Group 2
  • User 583
  • Posts: 3646
« 2020-Mar-20, 10:03 PM Reply #477 »
You should have followed Mark Guest whose suggested quaddie was successful (192 combos for the 4k result)

Online wily ole dog

  • Group 1
  • User 218
  • Posts: 26967
« 2020-Mar-21, 06:53 AM Reply #478 »

......that may well be so,

................ the reality, alas, is that 'no one' considered it a genuine winning chance.......and had no good reason to.


That’s because the “no ones” who you refer to don’t do the form. Just like you :bulb:

Online wily ole dog

  • Group 1
  • User 218
  • Posts: 26967
« 2020-Mar-21, 07:01 AM Reply #479 »

...... another rough night at the 'vale of tears'

..... the first and last took most punters out of otherwise confident quadrella bets

I will plead guilty to being a 'never learner'  -- just one among far too many sucked in to follow the form.




I had Alsvin in my black book  :thumbsup:

I also had the $25 winner Mamzell Tess as one of my 2 selections in the last leg of the main quaddy.  :thumbsup:


Do your form Peter  :bulb:
« Last Edit: 2020-Mar-21, 07:05 AM by wily ole dog »

Offline Wenona

  • VIP Club
  • Group 1
  • User 175
  • Posts: 7449
« 2020-Mar-21, 09:50 AM Reply #480 »
Quote from: Peter Mair on 2020-Jan-05, 06:58  PM


    I would have a rule 'scratching' horses at the gates with an SP > 20/1,  until the field is reduced to 10 or less.

Online wily ole dog

  • Group 1
  • User 218
  • Posts: 26967
« 2020-Mar-21, 10:57 AM Reply #481 »
Quote from: Peter Mair on 2020-Jan-05, 06:58  PM


    I would have a rule 'scratching' horses at the gates with an SP > 20/1,  until the field is reduced to 10 or less.

  :lol:
If it wasn’t so funny :tin:

Mind you, we know what a complete fool he is.

Remind me Peter why you are no longer employed in the racing industry  :whistle:

Online wily ole dog

  • Group 1
  • User 218
  • Posts: 26967
« 2020-Mar-21, 03:24 PM Reply #482 »

Mourningtown -- obviously -- will be best avoided on Saturday


............. these regional clubs cannot resist the temptation to take more money instead of providing racing likely to be fair to most punters.

Check the field sizes:

https://racingaustralia.horse/FreeFields/Acceptances.aspx?Key=2020Mar21%2CVIC%2CMornington

..............standalone = stand aside

Well 7 races down and Mair has goosed himself again. Favoured runners dominating

Fave
3rd fave
2nd fave
2nd Fave
Fave
Fave
2nd fave

  :lol:

Online wily ole dog

  • Group 1
  • User 218
  • Posts: 26967
« 2020-Mar-21, 04:30 PM Reply #483 »

Mourningtown -- obviously -- will be best avoided on Saturday


............. these regional clubs cannot resist the temptation to take more money instead of providing racing likely to be fair to most punters.

Check the field sizes:

https://racingaustralia.horse/FreeFields/Acceptances.aspx?Key=2020Mar21%2CVIC%2CMornington

..............standalone = stand aside


Time you stood aside Mair

Quaddy paid $460 and the early $600

Clearly your brain fart was ignored by punters  :lol:

Offline Peter Mair

  • Group 1
  • User 326
  • Posts: 5088
« 2020-Mar-21, 08:45 PM Reply #484 »

The quest for 'fair fields', always,  is not answered by one day's outcomes


One fair outcome, today, does not compensate for past unfairness.

Even Monty read the form right today.

The sense of presenting 'fair racing' is best protected by club promoters having policies on 'acceptances' that ensure the prospect of a fair race, one not compromised by fields inflated by runners, hoping for 10th, impeding the running of runners there to win. 

Online wily ole dog

  • Group 1
  • User 218
  • Posts: 26967
« 2020-Mar-22, 07:26 AM Reply #485 »

The quest for 'fair fields', always,  is not answered by one day's outcomes




Well, you got that right. A bloody shame for you that you’ve got most other days massively wrong as well : :thumbsup:

Offline Peter Mair

  • Group 1
  • User 326
  • Posts: 5088
« 2020-Mar-23, 09:20 PM Reply #486 »


w-o-d  posts from the kennel,

................ every thing the w-o-d posts suggests he is an urger associated with RVL and its affiliates.

Until he is unveiled, for who and what he is,  his posts should be treated with contempt.

Online wily ole dog

  • Group 1
  • User 218
  • Posts: 26967
« 2020-Mar-24, 08:37 AM Reply #487 »
Oh peter. Give up. You’re wrong yet again  :lol:

Fock, you must hate looking in the mirror every morning

Offline Peter Mair

  • Group 1
  • User 326
  • Posts: 5088
« 2020-Mar-24, 09:16 PM Reply #488 »


........another silly senseless remark   -- fess up......... to who are you and your linkages... or just a noisy phantom.

Offline Peter Mair

  • Group 1
  • User 326
  • Posts: 5088
« 2020-Mar-25, 08:35 PM Reply #489 »

Bendy-no-go on Saturday------  this advice looks best {/b]

                                                        ..... 'no go' starts favourite:

Check the inflated fields:

https://racingaustralia.horse/FreeFields/Acceptances.aspx?Key=2020Mar28%2CVIC%2CBendigo'

Check the rough results from last year:

https://www.tab.com.au/racing/2019-03-30/BENDIGO/M/R/9/Win

. ...............who dares.....will not win?


Offline Peter Mair

  • Group 1
  • User 326
  • Posts: 5088
« 2020-Mar-27, 09:31 PM Reply #490 »


Today's results -- racing administrators in NSW and Victoria  should be stood down

https://www.tab.com.au/racing/2020-03-27/MUSWELLBROOK/MUS/R/1

https://www.tab.com.au/racing/2020-03-27/PAKENHAM/PAK/R/9

This is disgraceful.

Online wily ole dog

  • Group 1
  • User 218
  • Posts: 26967
« 2020-Mar-28, 08:17 AM Reply #491 »
Poor Pete didn’t see the last run of Petrology or the blinkers going on for the first time on the former G1 winner  :lol:

Online fours

  • Group 1
  • User 704
  • Posts: 6353
« 2020-Mar-28, 09:56 AM Reply #492 »
Ahem,

Petrology graded NUMBER 1 on ratings very clearly for that race.

Can't get any easier or UNHIDDEN then that.

But of course Peter does ZERO work and even less learning.

Fours

Offline Wenona

  • VIP Club
  • Group 1
  • User 175
  • Posts: 7449
« 2020-Mar-28, 04:46 PM Reply #493 »
Let's again remind everyone of Pete's wisdom:

Quote from: Peter Mair on 2020-Jan-05, 06:58  PM


    I would have a rule 'scratching' horses at the gates with an SP > 20/1,  until the field is reduced to 10 or less.

Offline Peter Mair

  • Group 1
  • User 326
  • Posts: 5088
« 2020-Mar-29, 11:28 AM Reply #494 »


Monty does Bendigo,

As expected, the results for racing at  Bendigo yesterday show that it was a 'no go' for most punters.

What these results do not show is that Monty's top-5 -- in the smh -- included 8 of the 9 winners in the 5 -- and in the early-quadrella races his winning selections (after scratchings) were his second or third apart from the 2yro race won by his 5th selection.

...........this quadrella paid $4000 and 5,500 on the nsw and vic TAB.


Online Jeunes

  • VIP Club
  • Group 2
  • User 296
  • Posts: 3674
« 30 minutes ago Reply #495 »
Lowest quaddie I have seen in Pinjarra today. $17.60


BACK TO ALL TOPICS
Sitemap