Seems a reasonable request
They are reasonable questions and notice that we never get an answer. It is like Groundhog Day with him
In the opening piece of the Zejlko thread is a single unassuming sentence paragraph that is so important to understanding all this:Industry talk has him employing anything from 30 to more than 100 staff just to analyse form.
If he had this method of certainty whereby he could just win every time he bets because of the rebates why would he be employing form analysts?
What is a more likely scenario is that he uses his rebate combined with form analysis to eliminate no hopers to reduce his market to under 100% and then applies bets on the remaining runners so he cannot lose.
The percentage points would be small but under scale they would add up to a high net figure per race.
However there is some risk. He must cop the occasional situation where one of those eliminated bobs up. But if the sum won on the winning races exceeds the sum lost on the occasional race then he is in front.
The rebates can only be paid from the TABCorp part of the rake meaning that mathematically it is impossible to back every runner on a totalizator and win every race even if you are getting a rebate.
There is more work involved and more risk to overcome than what people are suggesting. Blind Freddy should be able to see that even his plays on large Keno jackpots have a risk involved i.e. some little old lady from the Ettalong Bowling Club might jag 10 out of 10 on Keno while he is betting big into the pool.
As I said, if there is no risk involved then why is he employing so many people to do the form? Basically I would think he is doing Don Scott/Pittsburgh Phil with a rebate to help improve the percentages in his favour.