PK .............. new to the forum perhaps

                     .........  a load of psuedo intellectual bullshit is not a likely strategy to engender respect.

Few, if any, would have any understanding of what you are saying.

Give us some immediately factual somethings on which you want to hang your credibility.

Otherwise ... piss off.

Clearly Mair is directing this to himself. The penny has finally dropped with  him  

Dye: How $3bn computer geniuses have killed off big-time punters...

Would anyone be able to post this article or PM it to me?  Sounds interesting.

Cheers.

 

Probably just details how they profile customers and insert traders/managers between some customers and the betting software to limit or totally stop their activities.

May go into different markets for different customers again depending upon their profiles and the sharing of info between corps.....

I'd be surprised if there was anything new in the article not already known to decent punters.

Click bait for the site the most likely explanation.

Fours

I'm not a paid subscriber on Punters but it just opened up for me when I clicked through off Facebook.

Nothing any of you wouldn't know ..... 30 thousand feet commentary on the likes of Woods / Benter and the computer syndicates in HK, other references to Zeljko, David Walsh and Phil Turner.

He's mainly bemoaning that the days of big bettors like George Freeman, Robert Trimboli, Kerry Packer, Mark Read etc are long gone.

Thanks mate.

'Punter’s Edge': just be grateful for the open-book accountability -- and ask for more [next day]

......... as a side bet, my money would be on Monty to have done better today than any iQ tipsters in Sydney and Brisbane.

'Punter’s Edge': just be grateful for the open-book accountability -- and ask for more [next day]

......... as a side bet, my money would be on Monty to have done better today than any iQ tipsters in Sydney and Brisbane.

How’d mounty go yesterday. Given his 8 selections in every race I assume you’ll report some form of success

jfc,

More an oval than a circle and compressed somewhat on one side.

Fours

Arthur and Mair are a duo of disingenuous dotards.

I published my analysis that showed the Field Sizes do not cause Market Inefficiencies. That should have been the end of the matter and STFU time. But Mair has not taken the hint.

In Arthur's case I got shangaied into developing a Monte Carlo simulation to correctly convert Ratings to Market Odds, as opposed to the mathematical obscenities of Don Scott. No one questioned the method, though some opined that Performances were not a Normal Distribution.

Arthur was not involved, but after some bizarre collect, he wanted a pretext to crow, and tried to use that solitary outcome as a basis to attack my method.

Now, months later, he chooses to resume his attack.

The guy has been making dumb plays all his long life, and has no genuine interest in lifting his game. Only in attacking those who have succeeded.

He may claim not to understand the Monte Carlo method, but drag him (or his ilk) onto the witness stand, and they will find that they agree with all the steps and conclusions involved.

It's just that they've never bothered to try to think.

I have no idea what you lot are talkin* about I just watch videos. Way simpler   

No,  it can’t be too hard for some, Peter

Racenet iQ :How your world on the punt has changed in 4 months
 
Thousands have already joined as members. It is also true to say that thousands of once-trial-members have already sucked and saw and left.

It is certainly true to say that many thousands more were 'members' of Racenet before the murdochmen withdrew access that was 'free of charge'. Racenet was free of charge for decades. The business was built by the punters attracting the advertisers and sponsors that paid the freight to build Racenet.

.......... and then along came the murdoch monopolists ........ bought the business ... bought  familiar names ...... bought them suits and ties .......... took flash new photos ........ put a price on access... proceeded to swamp 'members' with more tips every day than would be found on an asparagus farm.

I doubt the business is profitable.

Problem is there is no accountability for the hyped-up clickbait. One can only wonder what the murdochmen think of punters .. the 'mugs' of old comes to mind.

“Among the array of content delivered by our newsroom 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, our team provides members with unique insights from selected jockeys and trainers about all their rides and runners before every Saturday raceday,” “Members who regularly follow this feature have been lucky enough to be steered into some big-priced winners directly from the mouths of jockeys and trainers".

Even today, punters taking at face value an implied promise of disclosure -- steered into some big-priced winners  --  were greeted with:
                                                                       There is more to this story

There is a lot more to this story.

How did we go today boys?

Probably not so well at Flemington where RVL flumoxed the form guides again.

Need someone good on the team:  check the SMH's Monty -- at Rosehill today he starred in the 8 quadrella races and at Ipswich he took the early-Q in a canter.

Canterbury today will suit you but you still carry on like a Pratt.
Biggest field is probably 9 runners...........oh I forgot, you don’t know how to read a form guide so how would you know