Racenets reputation 'on the line'
My main point here is the failure of Racenet, in an era of benchmark-rated-racing, to show the actual 'rating' of races contested.
My main point here is the failure of Racenet, in an era of benchmark-rated-racing, to show the actual 'rating' of races contested.
What was thebenchmark- rating of these races:
Rosehill Gardens R5 30/10/2021 2000m Good3 ROSEHILL GOLD CUPTrue $750K
Aquis Park Gold Coast R4 15/01/2022 1300m Good3 $1M MM F&M 3YO&Up SW&P
Royal Randwick R5 17/10/2020 1200m Good4 THE KOSCIUSZKO True $1.3M
Rosehill Gardens R7 30/10/2021 1500m Good3 GOLDEN EAGLE True $7.5M
Punters cannot do the form without a benchmark to base assessments.
.............. 'rating-obscure' races are now endemic in the programs for even the 'best' races ... let alone other 'sponsoted races'.
BACK TO TONITE!
Tonight was something of a disappointment for both 'The Tone' and The-Guest.
No one can be accoutable for what happens on a Friday at either Canterbury or the 'vale -of-tears'
At Canterbury the Q's paid $30k and $13k ............. at the Vale, $1.4 and $4.0k.
Why does Racenet allow this nonsense?
Why does Racenet -- and The Tone and The Guest --- not simply say this is 'raffle racing', way beyond the ken of any pretension to form analysis?
............. why do it ............ why pretend what is done is useful?
Stop it!
[.......needless to say ...........mainly useless tips from both 'freely ' available for tonight are now behind the paywall ... they do not even play open and fair]
Who will pay for these kids tips tomorrow?