ROULETTE RACING - Racing Talk - Racehorse TALK harm-plan harm-plan

Racehorse TALK



ROULETTE RACING - Racing Talk - Racehorse TALK

Author Topic: ROULETTE RACING  (Read 3952 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online jfc

  • Group 1
  • User 723
  • Posts: 6980
« 2019-Jul-21, 07:34 AM Reply #75 »
I'd venture the perps who concocted the O&E must get sick in the gut whenever an O&E fails to pay a dividend. Because such NoPays are a stark testament to its unpopularity.

In that case imagine how they must feel after the dogs yesterday - a Saturday!

From 75 races there were 23 NoPays!

Even at Wentworth Park and Bulli!

$3696.70 for the Merged Pool at WP1 yet nothing on the Favourite O&E.

And for good measure look at R10 where the O&E paid $1.00!

Wonder how much those 2 girls from the incessant O&E ads were jumping for joy!


5 The Gardens
1 Bulli
1 Wentworth Park
3 The Meadows
3 Bendigo
3 Ipswich
7 Cannington

23/75

Online jfc

  • Group 1
  • User 723
  • Posts: 6980
« 2019-Jul-28, 05:33 PM Reply #76 »
O&E turnover is continuing to tank.

And here is an amazing result.

This was the biggest Quinella on the main Victorian Gallops meeting.

Yet not one soul managed to get the O&E! (Nor the Trio).

First time I've noticed a Gallops O&E that did not pay.

Obviously not a good omen.

https://www.tab.com.au/racing/2019-07-28/BENDIGO/BEN/R/9/Win

Offline Peter Mair

  • Group 2
  • User 326
  • Posts: 4715
« 2019-Jul-28, 09:00 PM Reply #77 »

Some accountability, please

Mistakes are made in product development -- and in 'focus groups' misled to believe that 'this one' will be a winner.

Think 'edsel ford'.

The apparent mistakes in the promotion of 'O&E' betting are of a different dimension.

................. no sensible one would have believed the product would  have contributed much to the RNSW  pool for the 'funding of racing' .

................... conversely, apparently, some racing administrators did believe that ........... and, worse, they encouraged the 'independent' racing media to give prominence to party-line reports of their belief.

That farce only exposd the racing media as dictation taking lackeys --some payback is well overdue.

How can the Nine-Fairfax bunker hold the line on 'independent always'?

Now, come mountain-climbing time, these same administrators will be similarly 'asking' the independent journalists to report 'Trump like crowds' attending the soon to  be un-royal Randwick.

......... the question to be put ...... this year and last............is how many 'free' on-course tickets are to be distributed for the mountain day?


Online jfc

  • Group 1
  • User 723
  • Posts: 6980
« 2019-Aug-04, 08:57 AM Reply #78 »
Stopped recording O&E for Dogs on July 28.

Here are the complete results for level staking the Field.

2425 Pays
347 No Pays

$7,275.00 Outlay
$6,143.72 Return
$1,131.28 Loss
15.55% Loss %

Confirming my earlier observations that the actual Rake is over 2 times the claimed Rake!

26.71% Odds
12.50% Evens
7.44% Split

Offline Peter Mair

  • Group 2
  • User 326
  • Posts: 4715
« 2019-Aug-04, 06:38 PM Reply #79 »


Any suggestion that racing administrators may have 'miss-spoken' is out of order.

Offline Peter Mair

  • Group 2
  • User 326
  • Posts: 4715
« 2019-Aug-06, 08:23 PM Reply #80 »


What figures are the administrators feeding to Richie at Racenet?

TRACKING ABOVE TARGET
 
When the TAB launched its new betting type ODDS & EVENS the potters were quick out of the gates.

Every television show isnít suited to your liking and itís the same with betting but sometimes you need to open your eyes and think 'will others like it'?

Odds & Evens has a big job to do as it is the funding model behind the $7.5 million The Golden Eagle and some new $1 million prizemoney races in the trots and greyhounds.

My mail suggests the early figures are highly promising and tracking well above initial expectations. 

Online jfc

  • Group 1
  • User 723
  • Posts: 6980
« 2019-Aug-06, 08:29 PM Reply #81 »
I actually happen to know the O&E is tracking.

Watch this space.

But, for now I'll wager my testicles that Richie's mail has its pants on fire.

Offline Peter Mair

  • Group 2
  • User 326
  • Posts: 4715
« 2019-Aug-06, 09:38 PM Reply #82 »

Is the plot sickening?

If the figures paraded by 'jfc' are close to the truth, it raises questions about what contrary figures are being given to Racenet.

Richie has placed a big bet on his credibility as 'independent'  -- as did Clinton Payne, even before the pattern of figures was established.

.... commonsense dictates that observers put O&E in the same basket of confusing nonsense as 'spinner' and 'duets' and 'et al' that attract pools of no consequence making little if any difference to the total TAB take.

.............. why would Racenet get involved apart from asking RNSW/tabcorp for the true figures.

In the background is the prospect of a takeout of Racenet as the news-corpse stirs.

 

Online Jeunes

  • VIP Club
  • Group 2
  • User 296
  • Posts: 2940
« 2019-Aug-07, 07:35 AM Reply #83 »
I actually happen to know the O&E is tracking.

Watch this space.

But, for now I'll wager my testicles that Richie's mail has its pants on fire.

JFC,  I think you are safe. Not the first Richie got something wrong. I liked his dadís columns better.

Nowadays, people donít question most figures given to them as how they are calculated is confusing to many. In the old days mental arithmetic was a norm, now it has no relevance to many or logistics of credibility when it comes to numbers.



BACK TO ALL TOPICS
Sitemap