So can we assume there will be no more posts from you on this subject because you won't be watching 

For soemone who bags Sky you seem to watch a lot of it.

Most of us who would have complaints about the Caulfield track bias would say so on a Melbourne racing thread.

Not you. You are off complaining about it on the Sky Racing thread   

The last time I watched Sky 1 was in fact to watch Lazarus in the Inter Dom final so it hardly equates to watching it a lot ....does it?

You surely are not supporting the practice of cutting away from races like the Hunter Cup before they are completed..... are you?

Sky deserved to be criticised for that garbage and considering the history of the race and money invested on it it does show the respect Sky have for punters.
Why do I know already that you weren't even watching.

I'll stop criticising Sky Racing the day I see something that shows you can be remotely objective on the subject.

Pleased to hear that South Australian racing will now be showcased on Racing. com. at the beginning of the new season.

Flicked over to Sky 1 on Saturday to watch a couple of the better races from Adelaide but it is a painful experience.
There is far too much happening on the screen and having to listen to the celebrity in house expert is hard going.
Didn't think there was anyone in the world that has all the form covered for gallops, trots and greyhounds but Sky seem to have  them all signed up.

Have no interest in the red hots and with greyhounds seemingly unable to rid themselves of crooks, have no interest there either.

From 1st August will have no need to watch Sky 1.........Whoopee.

You changed your mind about the trots did you?

What happened to the August 1st declaration.........

But what about you coming on here to have a go at Sky about the Caulfield track bias?

You said:

"Listening to the Caulfield track manager's track report on Saturday, we were all informed that they would be sticking to the successful rail movement from previous years."

But I cannot see any complaints from you directed at the Melbourne racing authorities on any other thread. Instead you come on here and bag Sky Racing for broadcasting his comments.

Why 

You have taken something out of context.
I was referring to statements made by Sky Racing that punters have never had it so good with being provided with information and Sky Racing were responsible for for that.

I've criticised Mel. race tracks on other threads.
Quite happy to speak out on Racing. com's facebook page.

Seriously you people at Sky and the TAB are hopeless.

No place betting on a 25 horse hurdle race and interrupted coverage of same race.

Hopeless.

  as long as they get my money   

You having a break today SW?

Woman on Sky 1 needs to listen the comedy Naked Vicar, the classic race caller family. Grating.

Anyone know why Lizzie Jelfs is leaving Sky racing?

While I only occasionally flick over to Racing NSW...she was a standout.
One expert that did sound rather expert!
Hard enough to tolerate the "experts" anywhere (racing.com) included.

Must be a difficult place for anyone to work....that place....Sky racing.
I wouldn't last 5 minutes.

All the best for the future, Lizzie

Her tips will pop up somewhere I guess ut a huge loss. I don’t always back hers or any other tips but occasionally I double my bet if she picks mine from the yard

Exceptional judge

I see the stewards tweeted that the first race was delayed by broadcast issues, so maybe there is a camera problem

I was watching the Kingsford Smith cup and it was a photo finish but they go straight to the winning trainer without even showing a replay of the finish. It was a neck between 1st and 4th too. What a joke.